Responsible Investing: Development, Pitfalls and the Route Ahead

EHL Hospitality Commercial College held the third edition of the Sustainable Funding Discussion board in June 2025, specializing in shareholder engagement as an indispensable driver of sustainable ideas. This article shares insights on what in price investing is, exploring these days’s challenges, probably choices, to boot to what the future could presumably well also preserve. Parts of the findings of this article had been presented at some stage in the Discussion board.

What is Responsible Investing?

The interval of time in price investing is in general extinct interchangeably with ideas a lot like sustainable investing or ESG investing. Nonetheless what invent these terms if reality be told mean?

• Responsible investing: an umbrella interval of time for investment approaches that take notice of no longer handiest monetary returns nonetheless additionally environmental and societal outcomes.
• ESG investing: specializes in incorporating particular Environmental, Social and Governance elements (e.g., carbon emissions, labor requirements and board diversity) into monetary prognosis and portfolio selections.
• Influence investing: goes a step extra, aiming to generate measurable certain impact whereas garnering monetary returns.

No topic which be conscious you exercise, these approaches picture an evolution from the older idea of Socially Responsible Investing (SRI), which began in the 1960s as value-based screening (with the exception of tobacco, alcohol, fingers, and a variety of others. from one’s portfolio). ESG reframed this field of investing by emphasizing likelihood management and lengthy-interval of time value introduction.

Responsible investing has gone mainstream and is projected to achieve USD 40 trillion by 2030, or in the case of 1-third of world resources beneath management (Bloomberg Intelligence, 2023).

Such future growth is excellent. Nonetheless has it if truth be told transformed markets? The retort, so far, is mixed.

The Promise Versus the Truth

The brief expansion of ESG merchandise suggests a monetary revolution is afoot. Pension funds, insurers and non-public equity corporations now offer “sustainable” funds. Asset managers increasingly market themselves as guardians of stakeholder pursuits together with social and environmental considerations.

But beneath this yarn lie contradictions: inconsistent scores, extinct enforcement, excessive-profile scandals and structural incentives that also prefer polluting industries.

Unless addressed, these weaknesses could presumably well also relegate ‘sustainable investing’ to a mere buzzword moderately than a transformative notice.

The Considerations of Responsible Investing

1. Complicated ESG scores

Merchants ask of scores to decrease thru the complexity. As a change, ESG scores regularly invent the reverse. Berg, Kölbel, and Rigobon (2022) sign that correlations between main ESG rating providers real looking correct 0.54, great decrease than the consistency of credit rating scores, where agencies customarily attach the identical or adjacent grades to the identical issuer.

Bissoondoyal-Bheenick et al. (2024) level to that this divergence reflects classic variations in scope, weighting and methodology. One provider could presumably well also reward disclosure, one other accurate outcomes. One could presumably well also prioritize carbon depth, one other labor requirements. The end result’s that a firm can heinous as a leader in one dataset and a laggard in one other.

This lack of comparability undermines the very cause of ESG files.

2. Greenwashing and credibility gaps

With out fixed requirements, companies can emphasize what flatters them and downplay what doesn’t. Several scandals spotlight the dangers:

• Volkswagen (2015): Marketed “shipshape diesel” whereas secretly inserting in emissions-cheating instrument.
• Goldman Sachs (2022): Fined by the U.S. SEC for failing to appear at its have ESG fund insurance policies.
• DWS (Deutsche Bank’s asset manager, 2022): Raided by German police for overstating ESG integration.

Such cases sign why voluntary ESG claims, with out enforceable auditing, can stumble upon as a cynical advertising and marketing ploy. As Kräussl et al. (2024) sign, merchants regularly overestimate the rigor and underestimate the inconsistency of fresh ESG practices.

3. The efficiency paradox

ESG is in general marketed as a earn-earn: merchants can “invent successfully by doing factual”. But the evidence is foggy. A evaluation by the NYU Stern Heart for Sustainable Commercial (2021) of over 1,000 studies came upon that 58% of those studies report certain links between ESG and monetary efficiency, 21% fair, and 13% destructive. In transient, literature parts in no single course.

Extra fresh studies (Dsouza et al., 2025) sign ESG improvements can make stronger firm value and investor returns in OECD countries, nonetheless handiest when paired with regulation and investor scrutiny. ESG, in other phrases, is no longer a assured driver of returns. Its advantages are highly contextual.

4. Misaligned incentives

Presumably the supreme contradiction lies in world markets themselves. Despite ESG’s rise, fossil fuels dwell heavily sponsored by national governments, to the tune of over USD 7 trillion in 2022 (Worldwide Monetary Fund, 2023). Polluting industries because of this of this truth dwell financially magnificent, which locations them at a bonus with merchants.

Why Regulation Issues

One other core plan is dimension. No longer like accounting, where unified requirements a lot like IFRS or US GAAP be trail comparability, ESG disclosures dwell fragmented. Companies can cherry make a selection ESG reporting, regularly emphasizing metrics that sign them in a favorable gentle.

The European Union has taken the lead in addressing this hole:

• The Company Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD), phased in from 2024, requires thousands of companies to checklist sustainability files in maintaining with the standardized European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). They consist of the idea that of double materiality, i.e. corporations must report on every how sustainability issues have an effect on them and how their corporate actions impact society and the atmosphere.
• The Company Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD), applied from 2024, obliges successfully-organized corporations to name, stop and mitigate human rights and environmental harms at some stage in their offer chains.
• A new EU regulation on ESG scores (2024) requires rating providers to checklist methodologies and tackle conflicts of interest, bringing oversight to a sector lengthy criticized for opacity.
• But politics has resulted in compromise (or caving, depending for your be taught of the explain). In 2025, the European Rate presented an “omnibus” proposal to simplify CSRD responsibilities, elevate reporting thresholds and prolong points in time for smaller corporations (Deloitte, 2025).

These developments picture every ambition and realism. Europe is raising the bar nonetheless additionally finding out how inviting successfully-organized-scale sustainability reporting could presumably well also additionally be.

What Must Alternate

1. Unified dimension

The first requirement is apparent, comparable requirements. Appropriate as accounting guidelines stop companies from reporting earnings in no topic layout that suits them handiest, ESG needs its the same. With out harmonization — ideally at a world level thru convergence between CSRD and ISSB requirements — in price investing will dwell fragmented and open to abuse.

2. Enforceable accountability

Disclosure by myself is inadequate. ESG claims have to smooth be verified, audited and enforced. The fallout from the Volkswagen, Goldman Sachs and DWS scandals made one thing certain: with out penalties, greenwashing — or downright cheating — flourishes. As with monetary reporting, deceptive sustainability reporting have to smooth carry upright and pecuniary consequences.

3. Investor mindset shift

In the end, merchants themselves must shift expectations. Responsible investing is no longer a free lunch. It requires grappling with substitute-offs, between temporary returns and lengthy-interval of time resilience, between fiduciary responsibility and societal responsibility. As Kräussl et al. (2024) argue, the in price investor mindset is constructed much less on formulas than on the capability to ask serious questions.

The Road Ahead

Responsible investing has grown snappy in scale nonetheless smooth struggles with credibility issues. Conflicting scores, routine scandals and systemic incentives that prefer incumbent polluters all spotlight the outlet between promise and notice.

Closing that hole requires three shifts: unified world requirements, enforceable accountability, and a extra serious investor mindset. ESG must invent what accounting guidelines did for monetary transparency, namely foster popular uptake of stringent global requirements. Simplest then can in price investing transfer from buzzword to something merchants and the general public at successfully-organized can if reality be told assume in.

References

Ahmad, H., et al. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance-connected elements for substitute investments and sustainability: A literature evaluation. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 112233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02921-x

Bayat, A., Qu, R., & Rahmani, Z. (2025). ESG Rating Uncertainty: Causes, Penalties and Ability Therapies. SSRN working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5238193

Berg, F., Kölbel, J., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG scores. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfac033

Bissoondoyal-Bheenick, E., et al. (2024). ESG rating inequity: Implications and aggregation. Worldwide Review of Financial Diagnosis, 94, 102828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103532

Council of the EU. (2024). ESG scores: Council greenlights new regulation. https://www.consilium.europa.european/en/press/press-releases/2024/11/19/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-scores-council-greenlights-new-regulation/

Deloitte. (2025). Omnibus proposal: EU sustainability reporting responsibilities simplified. https://disappear.deloitte.com/USDART/home/publications/deloitte/heads-up/2025/european-commission-omnibus-proposal-sustainability-reporting-reduction-csrd

Dsouza, S., et al. (2025). Sustainable investing: ESG effectiveness and market value in OECD countries. Cogent Economics & Finance, 13(1), 2445147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2024.2445147

Worldwide Monetary Fund. (2023). Fossil gas subsidies database. IMF.

Kräussl, R., et al. (2024). A evaluation on ESG investing: Merchants’ expectations, beliefs and perceptions. Journal of Financial Surveys, 38(3), 721–746. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12599

NYU Stern Heart for Sustainable Commercial. (2021). Uncovering the Relationship by Aggregating Proof from 1,000 Plus Reviews Published between 2015–2020. https://www.stern.nyu.edu/sites/default/files/resources/documents/NYU-RAM_ESG-Paper_2021.pdf

Seek for source